Daily Archives: May 7, 2009

Crayons, Existentialism, and our Dystopia

child_scribble_age_1y10mOn occasion, when feeling the wrath of the ‘existential blues’, I secretly envy those with cookie-cutter world views. To have a set of beliefs laid out in front of you like cutlery on a table must be nice – yes, knives go to the right of you and forks to the left. While incapable of not being a skeptic, about anything, I am still torn by the theoretical decision of choosing between a life of ignorance and a life of truth seeking. Which is preferable?

I can only imagine the self worth one must feel by truly believing that they have a purpose outside of themselves, that they aren’t just members of a group of well dressed monkeys hobbling across a useless rock. What would it be like to never think beyond the sociopolitical structure that dictates the very boundaries of our waking life? To not be burdened by ethical dilemmas because right and wrong can be so clearly defined? Certainly that reality is very quantifiable, but it’s also very limiting. Would you rather color inside of the lines, or stray to the outside, where an infinite amount of blank canvas exists? Staying inside the lines and following the status quo is a quick and easy approach for drifting through life in linear fashion. From Point A to Point B we go, we follow the path and we’re careful not to stray. We’ve been told that everything will turn out okay in the end, and God forbid, we going exploring, the world is far too scary of a place for that.

Unfortunately for the thinker, the majority of the population has, by nature, chosen the former. With so many people in the world, and so few being thinkers, we’re stuck living inside a socially assembled world that has been crafted without our best interests in mind. It’s only natural for intellectuals to become increasingly more ideological as the calendar advances – for we’re always learning, always analyzing, and always seeking while the world at large remains stagnant and asleep at the wheel. Thus, a healthy cynicism begins to sprout up, eventually blossoming into full-fledged unhappiness with civilization as a whole. Throughout recorded history the thinker has always struggled against the ignorant masses and this is no exception.

With the advance of technology we’re supposedly more connected than ever, yet somehow nothing has fundamentally altered our way of discourse. Communication may have become easier, but that doesn’t change the fact that most people still don’t have anything to say. We’re like parrots squabbling back and forth to each other. We speak in gibberish that’s been spoon fed to us by multi-billion dollar entertainment corporations. We’re forced to conform to their rules, absorb the latest catch phrase, hear empty political rhetoric, be swayed by media fear mongering (swine flu anyone?), take lessons on how we should look, the way we should act, and what we should feel. We work too much and the only thing we have to show for it are gas guzzling automobiles and plasma TV’s. Suddenly, nothing is real. Just lies, regurgitated pig slop – it’s what’s for dinner. Dig in; you might as well enjoy it.

As thinkers we become progressively more appalled by the cheapening and commercialization of our very existence. We watch in horror as our friends and loved ones ‘sell their souls’ chasing pipe dreams in blind faith of this so-called American Dream – and they do it all with a rosy cheeks, fake smiles and lifeless eyes. Zombies now void of the presumably infinite curiosity of their youths. They’re beyond help now, there’s no turning back – and we’re starting to slip too. Coloring outside of the lines is becoming such a hassle, and it’s really getting lonely out here. Occasionally we’ll catch fleeting moments of inspiration which may, in turn, fuel short bursts of creativity. If we’re lucky enough to have captured it we’ll feel privileged to share it with anyone who dares to listen. But have no fear society, we’re getting weakened. We’ll be in our cubicles by sunrise as if nothing ever happened – still alone within our thoughts in a world that just wasn’t meant for us.

Po is a contributing writer and the founder of projectgroupthink.wordpress.com. Get instant updates for this blog via Twitter: PGTblog.

2 Comments

Filed under philosophy

Hope 2009

My friend Sam is a well-dressed, East Coast sort of a chap, deigning precisely once to don the less pretentious trappings of a simple t-shirt.  It’s a white background, against which is set the face of our fearless leader, President Obama. Behind this imposing visage is a familiar tri-color pattern and a simple message: hope.

It is not, in this article, my goal to talk about hope, though everyone else seems to be doing just that.  The stock market took a rise of late, waterboarding is a thing of the past, and Condi got called out by a fourth grader.  Things are looking good, admittedly, but many of us who recall more vividly the events of the last eight years are not so keen to bury the hatchet.  Some of you might recall warning friends or colleagues that they were electing little better than an illiterate zealot, and that they or someone they knew might have to pay for these irresponsible decisions.

And yet, time and again, America witnessed the Triumph of the Lemmings.

The question that begs my mind most adamantly is not one of hope, then, but one of forgiveness.  Ought nine finds the American people on the bitter end of a bad divorce, betrayed by our leaders and citizens in a relationship that, despite eight years of togetherness, has left both parties shamed and beaten.  Before we dare to hope, America must learn to forgive.

This is a tall order – most of you have probably shared in the sense of anger and disgust which for so many of us has defined the relation of Americans to their government for most of the last decade.  Kierkegaard might caution us that despair and anxiety are the precursors of hope and salvation.  Conversely, many philosophers would attribute this to sentimentalist hooey.  And we, each in our own hearts, must find the strength to answer a question whose darkness still shrouds the allegedly “bi-partisan” dynamic of our newest administration.

To ease the pain, we might notice that the Republican Party is more or less collapsing.  With Bush, Romney, and Cantor taking flight from Washington, Obama has four years (dare I say eight years?) to restore the glory that once was us, before the series of goofy wars from which America has recently struggled to free itself.  In light of our above-mentioned progress, and this karmic development for Cantor ‘n Friends, can the liberals of our time finally look our fellow citizens in the eyes?

This is a question that we all have to answer on our own accord, and I will posit my response.  The answer, as we say in philosophy, is contingent. The sort of anger incurred by the blatant and recurring failures of the Bush entourage might be viewed as a response to danger, an alert from our own minds and psyches that something has gone horribly awry.  Now that the threat is past, it is a defensible assertion that this consequent anger has outlived its purpose and/or use. My question, then, is: has the threat truly passed?

Has the Republican Party learned that theistic fundamentalists have no place in our political community?  Have war-mongering hawks finally conceded that they might wish to respect the lives our brave if ill-directed young warriors?  Has it at long last sunk in that liberty, equality, and peace should be the core tenets of any administration which dares to invoke the admittedly sullied name of America, the once-beautiful, as per those basic axioms laid down in our oft lip-serviced Bill of Rights?

I don’t know the answer to that.  I do know that plenty of the people responsible for this sordid affair are known to us as friends or relatives, and that I should caution myself against talk of peace while harboring so much hatred for the wrongs of yesteryear.  My challenge, to myself and to my readers, is that if we are to carry this resentment into the next decade, that it be a tempered vigilance, an edifying caution against the consequences of bigotry and ignorance, and not the subversive sort of resentment of our most bitter victimhood.  If we are called to lash out, then so be it, but for my part I hold that forgiveness might bring unity, and, depending on what remains of our faith in humanity, even love.

It sounds like a tall order – perhaps this is what is meant by talk of hope.

Redpillneo is a contributing writer for projectgroupthink.wordpress.com.  Get instant updates for this blog via Twitter: PGTblog.

6 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized